> Why not use pine? It it just as simple, text based.
> Handles attachments. It is wicked. Only fault is that
> it does not have any built in filter options. At least
> I do not think it has. Has anybody made any?

Since I like Mail, and it is built-in, I figure that I will use it unless
attachments are problematic. If Mail cannot handle attachments, then I will
consider Pine or Mutt.

And speaking of attachments, does anyone know how the Sendmail MTA stores
attachments? Are they stored as part of the spool file or is it a file by
itself it?


Thanks again!

Jeff Flowers