----- Original Message -----
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:28:31 +0200
To: fabrizio messina <fabrizio79@linuxmail.org>
Subject: Re: ls-120 support


> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:23:19PM +0100, fabrizio messina wrote:
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:08:59 +0200
> > To: fabrizio messina <fabrizio79@linuxmail.org>
> > Subject: Re: ls-120 support
> > 
> > 
> > > I've already seen this with zip drives formatted on win95. There's no partition
> > > table at all. Just mount it using /dev/sd0d
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
> > > --
> > > 
> > 
> > i've already tested and...look this message:
> > 
> > sd0: no disk label
> > mount_ffs: /dev/sd0d on /mnt/ls120: incorrect superblock
> 
> If it's formatted from win95  you want:
> mount -t msdos /dev/sd0d /mnt/ls120
> 

sorry, but i've already launched this command:

'mount -t msdos /dev/sd0d /mnt/ls120'

and this is the message

sd0: no disk label
mount_ffs: /dev/sd0d on /mnt/ls120: incorrect superblock
...

now, if i launch fdisk (and create msdos partition on entire disk) and after disklabel, i don't to use it on 
win95, because don't recognize this partition...

and so identical on 3.5 floppy ...

well, i think really to back to linux on this notebook...

hi, fabrizio


-- 
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org 


Powered by Outblaze