Subject: LIbrary problem
To: None <netbsd-help@netbsd.org>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thorbj=F6rn_Jemander?= <thorbjorn@jemander.net>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 11/06/2003 04:45:46
Hi,
I'm not sure this is the right forum for
this question. Please feel free to redirect me.
I'm trying to port wxDesigner to NetBSD.
I compiles and links OK, but it does not
run due to failure when resolving shared
libraries:
root@tellus:/usr/wxDesigner>ldd wxDesigner
wxDesigner:
-liconv.4 => /usr/pkg/lib/libiconv.so.4
-lm.0 => /usr/lib/libm387.so.0
-lm.0 => /usr/lib/libm.so.0
-lintl.0 => /usr/lib/libintl.so.0
-lglib-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libglib-2.0.so.200
-lgmodule-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.200
-lgobject-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.200
-lpthread.20 => /usr/pkg/lib/libpthread.so.20
-lgthread-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.200
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.200
-lX11.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 <<<< The
first occurrance
-lXext.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
-lXi.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6
-lXrender.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1
-lfreetype.8 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.8
-lexpat.4 => /usr/pkg/lib/libexpat.so.4
-lfontconfig.1 => /usr/pkg/lib/libfontconfig.so.1
-lXft.2 => /usr/pkg/lib/libXft.so.2
-lXrender.1 => /usr/pkg/lib/libXrender.so.1
-lz.0 => /usr/lib/libz.so.0
-lfreetype.9 => /usr/pkg/lib/libfreetype.so.9
-lpango-1.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libpango-1.0.so.200
-lpangoxft-1.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.200
-lpangox-1.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.200
-lgdk-x11-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.200
-latk-1.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libatk-1.0.so.200
-lgtk-x11-2.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.200
-lc.12 => /usr/lib/libc.so.12
-lintl.4 => /usr/pkg/lib/libintl.so.4
-lpangoft2-1.0.200 => /usr/pkg/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.200
-lX11.6 => not found <<<< The second
occurance
It thus failes to find X11.6, but as you can see -lX11.6 appears
twice in the list and the first time it occurs it is resolved
correctly - but not the second (see the last line) it is not.
Two questions:
1. Does to double inclusion of X11.6 indicate an error in it self?
2. What is the solution: removing the last X11.6 (how?) or make it
resolve (how?) ?
Any hints would be greately appreciated.
Please CC: me, since I'm not normally on this list.
/Thorbjörn