Subject: OpenOffice naming
To: None <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UHJ6ZW15c8WCYXcgUGF3ZcWCY3p5aw==?= <pp@kv.net.pl>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 04/20/2007 09:42:27
--Signature=_Fri__20_Apr_2007_09_42_28_-0500_+4XIrrkWBVFKHQgW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I opened the file to check what I could get from OO.org:
ftp://ftp.NetBSD.org/pub/NetBSD/packages/pkgsrc/README-all.html
openoffice2 is without binaries.
openoffice2-bin is with binaries but for Suse.
My questions:
1) Is the first item for NetBSD but for compilation on my own?
2) If the second item is for Suse why it is not said on related page:
ftp://ftp.NetBSD.org/pub/NetBSD/packages/pkgsrc/chat/ekg/README.html
I think "Suse sign" (word(s)) should be attached to description fields
in README-all.html as well. All suse apps should be manifested in this
way.
I'd suggest also changing "bin" part in the names for "suse" (e.g.
openoffice-suse-x.y.z). "Bin" tells that the thing is in binary form
(ok, it is) for NetBSD.
Regards,
p2o2
--
Przemysław (p2o2) Pawełczyk <pp_o2@o2.pl>
The LearN@BSD Project: http://pp.kv.net.pl
The LearN@BSD Project Forum: http://www.p2o2.fora.pl/
--Signature=_Fri__20_Apr_2007_09_42_28_-0500_+4XIrrkWBVFKHQgW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFGKNFbD9+eS/1tsfYRAsVzAJ9wc8oPUcAL1IgiapBrIbOT5IpyogCfQZp5
SzSJhmu3+8LwY2dEVKudWxs=
=K+LT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Fri__20_Apr_2007_09_42_28_-0500_+4XIrrkWBVFKHQgW--