Re: named problem (evbarm)

[Mark Davies <mark%mcs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost>]

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:50:53PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> >      "evbarm" is most likely a ${MACHINE}, not a ${MACHINE_ARCH}.
> >  You probably want $MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm".
>
> Yes, and mips should be fixed the same way.
        [...]
> I start thinking that we should invert the condition and only build
> named with threads on archs where we do know it realy works (i386
> and amd64?). [This is only on the netbsd-4 branch, of course, and
> only untill the fixsa branch has been merged]

I just updated a powerpc Mac Mini from 4.0_BETA/macppc to 4.0/macppc 
and struck the same problem.

cheers
mark