Re: rump vs. smbfs

["James K. Lowden" <jklowden%schemamania.org@localhost>]

Andrew Reilly wrote:
> I've been using
> smbclient as part of a backup script for years.  Works fine and
> reliably, if you're just putting a dump or tar file on a remote
> server.  

I'm surprised to hear that.  The last time I looked at the smbclient
sources was some years ago.  At the time there was *no* error checking. 
It was strictly a toy; a copy could fail and the exit code would indicate
success.  Has that changed?  

--jkl