Re: Can't get Version 5 networking running

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:06:16 -0400
"Michael D. Spence" <spence%panix.com@localhost> wrote:

> 
> I installed a new Dlink DFE-530 TX+ in my NetBSD Vers 5 system on
> Tuesday. This system faces Verizon FIOS and acts as a firewall for
> the rest of the network.
> 
> The system recognized it as vr0.  Here are the lines from dmesg.
> 
>   vr0 at pci2 dev 10 function 0: VIA VT6105 (Rhine III) 10/100
> Ethernet vr0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 22
>   vr0: Ethernet address: 00:24:01:08:93:22
>   ukphy0 at vr0 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface
> 
> I configured it to be the connection to the internal network:
> 
>     fxp0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>       address: 00:e0:18:4a:51:e4
>       media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
>     ex0: flags=8822<BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>       address: 00:60:08:9a:53:6c
>       media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
>     vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>       address: 00:24:01:08:93:22
>       media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
>       status: active
>       inet 192.168.1.6 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast
> 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::224:1ff:fe08:9322%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid
> 0x3 lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 33192
>       inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
>       inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
>       inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
>     
> 
> This worked flawlessly until Thursday evening when I tried to set up
> the new ActionTec router that Verizon sent me to replace the one that
> died.  (This router would normally be connected to ex0, but I took
> it away to keep things simpler.)
> 
> Now, all I ever get is 
> 
>     ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
>     ping: sendt
>     ----192.168.1.73 PING Statistics----
>     5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
>     ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
>     
> 
> Even though route show says it should be ok
> 
>     Routing tables
>     
>     Internet:
>     Destination        Gateway            Flags 
>     loopback           127.0.0.1          UGR    
>     localhost          127.0.0.1          UH     
>     192.168.1.0/24     link#3             U      
>     192.168.1.6        00:24:01:08:93:22  UHL    
>     192.168.1.10       00:0d:88:67:c9:b4  UHL    
>     192.168.1.64       00:22:3f:0b:f2:03  UHL    
>     192.168.1.73       00:50:da:10:51:d5  UHL    
> 
What is the interface on those routes?