NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Is fdisk necessary to partition a second disk exclusively for data?



On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:03:18 +0000
Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:46:14AM +0000, Gerard Lally wrote:
> > I am still trying to understand partitioning in NetBSD. I understand
> > the need to partition the active disk using fdisk, but am I correct
> > in thinking I don't need to use fdisk to partition a second disk
> > dedicated entirely to data? Is disklabel partitioning enough for
> > this second disk?
> > 
> > If so, can I offset the data partition at sector 0 or do I need to
> > offset it at sector 63?
> > 
> > And finally, is a disk partitioned this way able to grow to more
> > than 2 TB? I understand a disk partitioned using fdisk has a 2 TB
> > partition-size limit, but NetBSD supports enormous partitions of
> > zetabyes, which makes me think these partitions must be created
> > using disklabel !!!
> > 
> > I apologise if these are very basic questions for people here. My
> > head is spinning trying to understand the online documentation.
> 
> I think that you are correct on all counts! (I used to get away with
> root starting at offset 0, and no fdisk, but BIOSes seem to have got
> more picky "recently" ?10 years? - so all good for data disks...)

Thanks Patrick.

-- 
Gerard Lally

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index