NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?

To: Stephen Borrill <netbsd%precedence.co.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
From: Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov%comcast.net@localhost>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:44:24 -0400

,--- You/Stephen (Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:16:07 +0100 (BST)) ----*
| Having useful man pages is another difference between Linux and NetBSD...

Please give one example of a manual page, for the same functionality,
where the NetBSD version is superior to one in (a recent distribution
of) Linux (or FreeBSD, for that matter.)

(I feel you won't.)

-- Alex -- alex-goncharov%comcast.net@localhost --

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
  - From: Adam Hoka

References:
- Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
  - From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
  - From: Chavdar Ivanov
- Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
  - From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
  - From: Stephen Borrill

Prev by Date: Re: NetBSD vs FreeBSD
Next by Date: Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
Previous by Thread: Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
Next by Thread: Re: Why are drives called "wd0", "wd1", etc?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index