Hi, thank you all for your replies. Though, I'm still torn between the different solutions and which aspects measure worth. * mediawiki is the most stable solution. Though I personally don't like its syntax, it's well-known throughout the world. With the final switch, we'd have to transform the user content and database, and users have to switch to the new syntax, too. * ikiwiki is the wiki that should finally be used on netbsd.org. My matter with ikiwiki is only that I absolutely don't know it and cannot write perl, and would thus rather take another wiki. * fossil is my preferred solution, though it is the least-capable. The wiki is not thaaat full-fledged, though there might be Markdown support soon, too. It has the nice possibility to edit wiki articles offline and clone the wiki easily. What do you think? What is the probability of a migration, and will there really be that much content and contributors so these points really matter? Regards, Julian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature