NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer

To: netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
From: christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC)

In article 
<CABZpUSVPJsSOoCm=woC1Dhxn2vj_vgW--xJxJsBWziH_11PX9A%mail.gmail.com@localhost>,
Stephan  <stephanwib%googlemail.com@localhost> wrote:
>BTW, what is the reason that VirtualBox doesn´t run on NetBSD? Does
>ist require special porting?

If you mean for NetBSD to be a "host" instead of a "guest", yes special
support is needed:

https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VBox_vs_Others

christos

References:
- Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
  - From: Stephan

Prev by Date: Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
Next by Date: Re: powerd script failure
Previous by Thread: Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
Next by Thread: Re: Maintaining alternative OS: emulator vs linux emulation layer
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index