On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <freebsd%hub.org@localhost> wrote:Actually, according to what we are tracking at http://bsdstats.org, there are currently *8*: PC-BSD FreeBSD PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD) DesktopBSD OpenBSD NetBSD DragonflyBSD MidnightBSDTracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs (Open/Net/Free/Dfly).
I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. There is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no matter how many systems were installed.
And I also do happen to consider OS-X to be a BSD system. :-) Johnny
On 2012-11-16, at 12:30 AM, Alfred Perlstein <bright%mu.org@localhost> wrote:On 11/13/12 2:45 AM, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin <robin.bjorklin%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and create a Unified BSD?You'd end up creating a fifth.At least a sixth, IIRC. You left out MirBSD from your distribution list