Re: PaX bad tags error?

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On May 13,  1:30pm, gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost (Greg Troxel) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: PaX bad tags error?

| I suspect it's just messed up in a way that isn't interesting enough to
| debug.  I'll rebuild it - it's a testament to NetBSD stability that it
| the same binary was workable since 2004 anyway.
| 
| Notes at offset 0x0000010c with length 0x00000018:
|   Owner         Data size       Description
|   NetBSD                0x00000004      NT_VERSION (version)
| 
| Notes at offset 0x00006210 with length 0x00000064:
|   Owner         Data size       Description
|   01.01         0x00000000      NT_VERSION (version)
|   01.01         0x00000000      NT_VERSION (version)
|   01.01         0x00000000      NT_VERSION (version)
|   01.01         0x00000000      NT_VERSION (version)
| readelf: Warning: corrupt note found at offset 64 into core notes
| readelf: Warning:  type: 1, namesize: 00000008, descsize: 00000000

Yes, perhaps. Also this is just a diagnostic message telling you
about a strange tag that the kernel is ignoring. I non-DIAGNOSTIC
kernel will be silent.

christos