NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: NPF on domU - more clarity required



John Nemeth <jnemeth%cue.bc.ca@localhost> writes:

> On Dec 27, 10:56am, Greg Troxel wrote:
> } > On Dec 26, 11:32pm, Gerard Lally wrote:
> } 
> } > } As a sidenote, if there's a way of eliminating the grub cruft and using
> } > } NetBSD's boot manager instead I'd be glad to hear it.
> } >
> } >      No, there isn't a way.  This is something that is controlled
> } > by the service provider, and not the domU.
> } 
> } But if we made /boot be able to use PV ops, then we could ask people to
> } let it be a kernel choice :-)
>
>      Sounds like you would be turning /boot into a mini-kernel.

I meant to be like pvgrub.

>      As ext2fs is based on FFS, I'm told that pvgrub (pygrub?) can
> read from FFS, but that the filesystem setup is highly restricted
> (i.e. only works with certain block sizes).  I don't seem to have
> the details at hand.

It would be good to put those in the VPS section.  A restricted /
(ffsv1, specific block sizes) may be less annoying for some than a /boot
partition.

>      One option would be to turn /boot into something that works
> like pvgrub.  This shouldn't actually be that hard.  This is
> something that I added to the project list a while ago:
> http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/xenboot/  Of course, this
> would require convincing the VPS operator to use it.

True, but convincing someone to write it and use it is far harder...

Attachment: pgphbuMhlpJfC.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index