NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Aw: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

To: netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Aw: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
From: carsten.kunze%arcor.de@localhost
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:25:32 +0200 (CEST)

Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:

> mandoc(1) does not process roff.

Very simplified described it acts somehow like "nroff -mandoc ..." or "troff -mandoc ...".
There it understands a large subset of the nroff/troff language.
(Only a few useres need real nroff/troff for typesetting other documents than manpages.)

Carsten

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
  - From: Ron Swiernik
- Aw: RE: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
  - From: carsten . kunze

References:
- Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
  - From: Greg A. Woods
- Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
  - From: Gerard Lally
- Aw: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
  - From: carsten . kunze

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
Next by Date: RE: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
Next by Thread: Aw: RE: Re: Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index