Re: Aw: Re: No option -p for make?

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <6121DA09-1907-475D-82B0-72E892A427F8%verizon.net@localhost>,
Dan LaBell  <dan4l-nospam%verizon.net@localhost> wrote:
>>
>> I think we can do something like that, but I am not sure how useful  
>> the
>> output would be? What do you want to use the output for?
>>
>> christos
>>
>
>
>Actually, I think "-d A", is probably more useful, and that POSIX.2,  
>basically,
>decided to settle on what GNU make does.  Just decided to comment on  
>this
>since original post wasn't very descriptive of what -p does.

Thanks, so we are going to leave this alone for now.

christos