Re: LVM question

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

wam%hiwaay.net@localhost ("William A. Mahaffey III") writes:

>these drives for that additional storage. However, perusal of the web & 
>man pages reveals that both ZFS & LVM2 are available for use. These are 
>more storage efficient than a RAID10, with slightly less tolerance of 
>plural HDD failures in the storage pool.

LVM on Linux supports mirroring, so that's comparable to RAID10.

LVM on NetBSD doesn't support redundancy yet. If you want that you
can configure LVM on top of raidframe.


-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."