Re: Modular X or system X?

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:54:39AM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> On 20 August 2015 at 11:48, Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:43:49AM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> >> On 20 August 2015 at 11:39, Steven Sartorius <ssartor%bellatlantic.net@localhost> wrote:
> >> > I'm about to do my first fresh install (amd64  7.0_RC3) of NetBSD on a
> >> > new machine in years and am wondering what the current thinking is on
> >> > X.  In the past it seemed like modular Xorg was the way to go.  Is that
> >> >  still the case or is the system provided X11 a better option?  Any
> >> > thoughts appreciated...
> >>
> >>
> >> I second this question. And it's also confusing, because the install
> >> file mentions modular Xorg server in the binary sets:
> >> http://nyftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-7/201508191750Z/amd64/INSTALL.html#Binary%20distribution%20sets
> >
> > The X11 provided with NetBSD *is* modular Xorg these days. So is the X11
> > in pkgsrc.
> >
> 
> Does the built-in xorg support custom files in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ ?

If this is a Xorg feature, it shoudl.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--