NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why doesn't NetBSD recognize my entries in /etc/hosts?
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 3:30 PM, Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-netbsd%yahoo.com@localhost> wrote:
>
>> On 16 September 2015 at 19:06, Johnny Billquist <bqt%update.uu.se@localhost> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-16 19:09, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>>>
>>> RE: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2014/04/27/msg014543.html
>>>
>>> I put domains that I want to block in /etc/hosts preceded by 0.0.0.0
>>> but I can still ping them.
>>>
>>> I rebooted, but I can still ping them.
>>>
>>> Then I have mass-changed all entries from 0.0.0.0 to 127.0.0.1 and I
>>> can still ping them.
>>>
>>> Rebooted, same thing.
>>>
>>> Why can I do this effortlessly with Windows and Linux but not with NetBSD?
>>
>>
>> First of all, using /etc/hosts as a way of block domains is extremely
>> unreliable and not really a meaningful way of actually block anything.
>
> Why? It works on other platforms?
>
>>
>> Second, I guess you haven't heard of /etc/nsswitch.conf. It also exists in
>> Linux. It tells which methods are used, and in which order. It might be that
>> you have dns before files.
>
> I've checked my nsswitch.conf, it's files before hosts
>
>>
>> Changing a destination to 127.0.0.1, and then pinging it, why would you
>> expect it to not work. 127.0.0.1 will most likely respond to pings.
>> Pinging 0.0.0.0 will also give some result. Most probably your default
>> gateway machine.
>
> Yes, I didn't express myself correctly. I meant that I ping the
> original host, not 127.0.0.1.
>
> BTW, rebooting TWICE produced the intended result. I wonder why I had
> to reboot twice.
>
>>
>> Maybe you should try and learn about /etc/hosts.deny as well as ipfilters?
>
> But again, why?
>
> If I have a list of 300 domains to block, this would not be practicable.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ottavio
Show us a sample hosts entry and the full output of your ping, please.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index