Re: pflogd consume CPU

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:06:35PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:06:54AM +0900, Miwa Susumu wrote:
> > 2016-02-07 1:15 GMT+09:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost>:
> > >>>>pflogd process consume CPU.
> > >>>>Because of that in load average is too high.
> > >>> Can you ktrace it?
> > >>this is kdump output.
> > >>sakura# kdump ktrace.out
> > >>   974      1 pflogd   EMUL  "netbsd"
> > >>   974      1 pflogd   CALL  read(3,0xbb912000,0x80000)
> > >>   974      1 pflogd   RET   read -1 errno 35 Resource temporarily unavailable
> > > And what does 'fstat -p 974' say about fd 3?
> > 
> > fd 3 is bpf.
> 
> I've seen something similar with arpwatch (might have been against bpf too),
> and with nagios reading a pipe (see my post today on current-users@
> about this).

I guess this is a 32bit host (i386 maybe) ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--