Re: RAIDframe corruption

[Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>]

    Date:        Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:55:03 +0100
    From:        manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
    Message-ID:  <1mjesf6.dj1fl5xzo35gM%manu%netbsd.org@localhost>

  | - 64 MB region at offset 498074652673 with many changes

You have 500GB dives, right?  So that is way out near the end.

What number(s) of sectors do the drives report (should be in dmesg) ?

What is in the labels for wd0 and wd1 (MBR probably, and the netbsd disklabel
if there is one, but GPT would be OK too - whatever you are using).
Note I mean the labels on the raw drives, not what is inside the raid
"device", that is irrelevant for this.

I assume the labels are the same on both drives, so only one (set) is needed.

And what are the raidframe parameters (the config file used).

It is possible that region is beyond what raidframe is managing, and
you have just compared 2 different sets of random crud.

kre