NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
wip/virtualbox vs emulators/qemu vs xen performance comparison?
I have a requirement where I plan to use NetBSD amd64 as a primary OS and
the system needs to occasionally run Windows for some applications.
Currently this is done with Linux-Virtualbox-Windows combo which I want to
migrate to NetBSD-and what?
Various mailing lists report Virtualbox to be faster. I have used the
same on Linux and found it satisfactory. I have used qemu on NetBSD and
felt it was slower.
In general is the motivation behind wip/virtualbox - speed and
performance? Would appreciate inputs.
And yes, I think I should consider xen in the comparison as well. (I don't
have processor details right now to assess virtualization support. Will
post soon. Assume it's supported.)
Please comment / help make the choice.
Mayuresh
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index