Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?

To: iam%sdf.org@localhost, netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 18:17:59 +0100

On 24.12.2018 17:09, Gua Chung Lim wrote:
>> For practical reasons we restrict c89 + extensions to building tools.
>> For the rest we prefer gnu99.
> If we still restrict to c89,
> does that mean (in majority) there are no keywords
> "inline", "restrict", "_Bool", "_Complex" or "_Imaginary"?

The restriction is for src/tools.

> (Note that I barely know what are extended by GNU.)
> I believed that "asm" was extended by GNU.

asm and some syntax sugax.

> Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
> Thank you,
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
  - From: iam
- Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
  - From: Gua Chung Lim

Prev by Date: Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
Next by Date: Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
Previous by Thread: Re: how much percent of netbsd core is c89?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index