Re: Alternative DVCS to git: hg?

[Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 11:26, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:18:06AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > So again, which commit broke the branch?  With subversion, I can't
> > answer that question.
>
> I am not sure I understand. svn log on the branch certainly
> shows all change sets, and all files touched. The point you are trying to
> make is that (if not put in the commit log) you can't identify the original
> trunk commit that got pulled up for each change on the branch?

That just tells me the history as recorded by subversion.

When two fully tested commits hit the repo at the same time, and the
result is broken, who do I blame? Subversion?  We can hardly wave a
finger at the developer who had the simple misfortune of being second
with their push?

With ACID, since the second developer's change gets rejected, they can
be rest assured that things didn't break.