NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg_add vs pkgin
Hi, Mayuresh!
Pkg_add/pkg_delete are reliable. Their job, however, is quite
simple:
- pkg_add is to install packages and their dependencies (if any);
- pkg_delete is to remove packages and (if requested) those that depend on them.
Pkg_add can perform a very simple upgrade, but if you request to install/upgrade a package that
depends on another package older version of which is already installed on your system
you will get an error as pkg_add will blindly try to install the newer version on top of the old
(and get a conflict).
Pkgin is more advanced: it builds a whole dependency tree and upgrade all dependencies.
--
Aleksej Lebedev
On Fri, May 10, 2019, at 19:10, Mayuresh wrote:
> http://pkgin.net/ says:
>
> NetBSD, and more widely, all operating systems relying on pkgsrc have
> tools like pkg_add and pkg_delete, but those are unable to correctly
> handle binary upgrades, and sometimes even installation itself.
>
> Could someone please clarify what it means? Are pkg_add / del not
> reliable?
>
> Mayuresh
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index