Re: Postfix based mailing list and yahoo's errors

[Dan LaBell <dan4l-nospam%verizon.net@localhost>]

Why are your standards on private sites? Greg?
I can't believe that trash is still on the internet, personally.
I mean how old is that site?
You know what an opinion is? It's the desire to same the thing
again, in essentially, the same way.

> https://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-still-harmful.html


And, it reads like someone got meh burned in a Computer Science class,
and then next time, someone else piled on with an *Is*Harmful*Joke*,
and then the 'paperback writer' left school, for a good job, with
healthcare, said to bye-bye to by Mommy's plan forever, so, can't  
really blame
them there, but she never knew *Dikjstra* was talking about Machine  
Code, or
the world of 1GL's, and proprietary 2GL's,  which was spanned more than
a few decades.


On Jul 9, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> That's an entirely different issue.  That practice is contrary to
> standards.
>
>
>
> > I notice netbsd mailing lists are neither altering From field nor  
> > adding
> > Reply-To. How does it work with yahoo? (I am assuming some yahoo  
> > users
> > would be there on the list.)
>
> I don't know if it does or doesn't work.  I would say that people from
> yahoo having trouble should consider a mail provider that allows  
> them to
> subscribe to mailinglists :-)
>
> > I have an smtp_header_check which adds Reply-To as the lists address
> > (quite contrary to yahoo's suggestion).
>
> And contrary to IETF standards.  Repent!