Re: DNSSEC vs netbsd-8/sparc?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Havard Eidnes <he%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:

>> Does anybody think that the bind bits in netbsd-8 are ok, even before we
>> talk about compilation?
>
> I'm about halfway through the diff between what's in-tree in
> netbsd-8 and what's in ISC BIND 9.10.5-P1, and all I find so far
> are

I asked because I had trouble maybe two months ago with bind failing to
resolve protonmailch due to some DNSSEC issue, on amd64, and the same
problem on earmv7hf-el.  The consensus seemed to be that bind and the
root keys file in 8 is old and probably shouldn't be used.

I have no idea if the present problem is related to that or not - just
asking if it was a "netbsd-8 on amd64 works, fails on sparc" clear case.