Re: backward compatibility: how far can it reasonably go?

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On Dec 8, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Greg A. Woods <woods%planix.ca@localhost> wrote:
> 
> That's one bullet I've dodged entirely already since my oldest systems
> are running netbsd-5 stable.  (Though in theory isn't there supposed to
> be COMPAT support for SA?)

int
compat_60_sys_sa_register(lwp_t *l,
        const struct compat_60_sys_sa_register_args *uap,
        register_t *retval)
{
        return sys_nosys(l, uap, retval);
}

SA is one of those things that's REALLY hard to provide compatibility for.

-- thorpej