NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt

To: netbsd-users <netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
From: Mayuresh <mayuresh%acm.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:50:40 +0530

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:53:51AM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> That'd be an OpenDKIM configuration thing.

Oh yes, thanks. I didn't realize I could set up those keys for alias
domain as well. Now added and dkim is getting attached.

-- 
Mayuresh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh

References:
- No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Jan Schaumann

Prev by Date: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Next by Date: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Previous by Thread: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Next by Thread: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index