NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: framebuffer console on old ATI
Hi Michael,
Michael wrote:
>
> Yeah, I fixed a few problems there, xrender support was broken for r1xx> Sun's xvr-100 card is a rebadged rv100...
Wonderful... eager to test.
>> How do I enable radeonfb? Can I do it through configurations or do I
>> need to compile my own kernel to try?
>
> radeonfb* at pci?
Do you mean I need to compile and enable it? Since Martin is asking a
debug kernel... I think I will try both then.
However, I see no radeonfb* in kernel config:
In the DRI legacy drivers:
#radeondrm* at drm? # ATI Radeon DRM driver
and then:
radeon* at pci? dev ? function ?
radeondrmkmsfb* at radeonfbbus?
>
> It's not a DRM driver, just an accelerated framebuffer console thing.
> If you have an iBook you probably used it.
Good to know. Yes, I have an iBook... and there I have strange issues...
will ask about that separately. It is a very young 10.0 install and I am
giving priority to getting all my Intel machines updated.
I am comparing how the T41 behaves, which has a more modern Radeon card.
There I get a framebuffer out of the box! and without any font issue either.
However, I think at the end drm is enabled there, not radeonfb.
[ 1.044664] radeon0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0: ATI Technologies
Radeon Mobility M300 (M22) 5460 (rev. 0x00)
[ 1.044664] radeon0: autoconfiguration error: unable to reserve VGA
registers for i386 radeondrmkms hack
[ 5.424688] radeon0: VRAM: 128M 0x00000000C0000000 -
0x00000000C7FFFFFF (64M used)
[ 5.424688] radeon0: GTT: 512M 0x00000000A0000000 - 0x00000000BFFFFFFF
[ 5.424688] [drm] radeon: 64M of VRAM memory ready
[ 5.424688] [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
[ 5.424688] [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 Z pipes initialized
[ 5.424688] radeon0: WB enabled
[ 5.424688] radeon0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr
0x00000000a0000000 and cpu addr 0x0xdc697000
[ 5.424688] radeon0: radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit
[ 5.424688] radeon0: radeon: using MSI.
[ 5.424688] radeon0: interrupting at msi0 vec 0 (radeon0)
[ 5.424688] [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
[ 5.473861] [drm] radeon: ring at 0x00000000A0001000
[ 5.513890] radeondrmkmsfb0 at radeon0
[ 5.513890] [drm] Initialized radeon 2.50.0 20080528 for radeon0 on
minor 0
[ 5.513890] radeondrmkmsfb0: framebuffer at 0xc00c0000, size
1400x1050, depth 32, stride 5632
[ 5.603954] wsdisplay0 at radeondrmkmsfb0 kbdmux 1: console
(default, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0
This is coherent to the generic kernel config I see.
Riccardo
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index