Subject: Re: pkg/35210: graphics/netpbm cannot be built under Interix-3.5
To: None <interix-pkg-people@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov@tut.by>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 12/08/2006 21:15:04
The following reply was made to PR pkg/35210; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov@tut.by>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: pkg-manager@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
pkgsrc-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: pkg/35210: graphics/netpbm cannot be built under Interix-3.5
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:12:03 +0200
>> > What does upstream they about this? I think it is reasonable, but it
>> > might be better to talk with the authors first. Infact, doing a real
>> > configure check would be a better idea.
>> If I were upstream, I could tell "our software is correct, talk
>> to microsoft", but this is loooong way. I'll notify png upstream
>> maintainers anyway.
> I meant using --version-script when it is not supported. That
> doesn't really sound like a png problem.
1)
a) MS's problem is that 'ld --help' lists not supported options.
b) ld --version-script crashed somewhere internally,
but ld's exit code is zero.
2) png's problem
'ld --help' is too weak test for --version-script.
MS's problems are more serious, of course.
> Or am I misunderstanding your problem?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1611756&group_id=106175&atid=643452
--
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.