Subject: Re: pkg/36492: editors/emacs (22.1) conflicts with lang/elisp-manual
To: None <uebayasi@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Mark E. Perkins <perkinsm@bway.net>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 06/15/2007 00:15:12
The following reply was made to PR pkg/36492; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Mark E. Perkins" <perkinsm@bway.net>
To: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net>
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, markd@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: pkg/36492: editors/emacs (22.1) conflicts with lang/elisp-manual
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:11:12 -0400
On 2007/06/14 19:55, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Mark E. Perkins wrote:
>
>> editors/emacs was recently updated to v22.1. From the NEWS file:
>>
>> The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual in Info format is built as part of the
>> Emacs build procedure and installed together with the Emacs User
>> Manual. A menu item was added to the menu bar to make it easily
>> accessible (Help->More Manuals->Emacs Lisp Reference).
>>
>> So now editors/emacs conflicts with lang/elisp-manual.
>
>>> Fix:
>>
>> Need appropriate CONFLICTS statements in emacs Makefile and
>> in lang/elisp-manual.
>
> I don't use elisp. But is the lang/elisp-manual good enough or the same?
They are not the same. I'm not a heavy emacs lisp programmer, so I'm taking
the GNU folks at their word that the new files (v2.9) are the proper
documentation to accompany emacs 22.1 (the elisp-manual package is v2.8, to
accompany emacs 21.2).
>
> Maybe editors/emacs should be taught not to install the info file --
> and either depend on the lang/elisp-manual package or don't depend on it.
Splitting the elisp info files out of the emacs package doesn't really make
sense to me, but I could live with it. OTOH, please do not just drop them in
favor of the existing lang/elisp-manual-21-2.8
>
> Jeremy C. Reed
>
> p.s. I assigned this to uebayasi (elisp-manual maintainer), but also
> emailed this to markd (emacs maintainer).