Subject: RE: pkg/37075 (readme target broken on Slackware Lunix 10.2)
To: None <pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: De Zeurkous <zeurkous@nichten.info>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 10/08/2007 01:40:02
The following reply was made to PR pkg/37075; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "De Zeurkous" <zeurkous@nichten.info>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: pkg/37075 (readme target broken on Slackware Lunix 10.2)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:35:38 -0000 (UTC)
On Mon, October 8, 2007 01:30, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/37075; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
> To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: pkg/37075 (readme target broken on Slackware Lunix 10.2)
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:28:25 +0200
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:20:02AM +0000, De Zeurkous wrote:
> > > exec does not use built-in or function, but expects a real program.
> > > Therefore you are calling the wrong make.
> >
> > It was merely a construction to avoid exactly this kind of replies.
> I'm
> > using an interactive shell and certainly no exec in practice. Besides,
> > I've already debunked this 'myth' on pkgsrc-users. Please re-open.
>
> This behavior is implemented by bash as well. Try
> env() { echo here
> }
> exec env
Sometimes I'm really wondering if you actually try comprehending something
thoroughly before letting your emotions run wild. I'll quote again, for
your perceived personal benefit:
> > It was merely a construction to avoid exactly this kind of replies.
> I'm
> > using an interactive shell and certainly no exec in practice.
>
That should pretty much open up the issue.
> I won't waste any further time on this.
Good to hear that. I hope our common interest in the good of the Project
will prevent us from having these infantile skirmishes in the future.
--De Zeurkous.
>
> Joerg
>
>