RE: pkg/37075 (readme target broken on Slackware Lunix 10.2)

["De Zeurkous" <zeurkous%nichten.info@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/37075; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "De Zeurkous" <zeurkous%nichten.info@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: RE: pkg/37075 (readme target broken on Slackware Lunix 10.2)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:35:38 -0000 (UTC)

 On Mon, October 8, 2007 01:30, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/37075; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: pkg/37075 (readme target broken on Slackware Lunix 10.2)
 > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:28:25 +0200
 >
 >  On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:20:02AM +0000, De Zeurkous wrote:
 >  >  > exec does not use built-in or function, but expects a real program.
 >  >  > Therefore you are calling the wrong make.
 >  >
 >  >  It was merely a construction to avoid exactly this kind of replies.
 > I'm
 >  >  using an interactive shell and certainly no exec in practice. Besides,
 >  >  I've already debunked this 'myth' on pkgsrc-users. Please re-open.
 >
 >  This behavior is implemented by bash as well. Try
 >  env() { echo here
 >  }
 >  exec env
 
 Sometimes I'm really wondering if you actually try comprehending something
 thoroughly before letting your emotions run wild. I'll quote again, for
 your  perceived personal benefit:
 
 >  >  It was merely a construction to avoid exactly this kind of replies.
 > I'm
 >  >  using an interactive shell and certainly no exec in practice.
 
 >
 
 That should pretty much open up the issue.
 
 >  I won't waste any further time on this.
 
 Good to hear that. I hope our common interest in the good of the Project
 will prevent us from having these infantile skirmishes in the future.
 
 --De Zeurkous.
 
 >
 >  Joerg
 >
 >