pkgsrc-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg/41240: Perl5 build issue on opensolaris due to getconf



The following reply was made to PR pkg/41240; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Michael C. Vergallen" <mvergall%telenet.be@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/41240: Perl5 build issue on opensolaris due to getconf
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:18:42 +0200

 Havard Eidnes wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/41240; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Havard Eidnes <he%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, mvergall%telenet.be@localhost
 > Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 > pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/41240: Perl5 build issue on opensolaris due to getconf
 > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
 >
 >  > >Description:
 >  > getconf fails to work correctly on solaris & opensolaris so
 >  > don't use it when building perl. This gives warning's that are
 >  > easely fixed.
 >  
 >  Can you please describe in a bit more detail how it fails?  Does
 >  it only emit warnings during the build, or does it completely
 >  fail to build?  I don't have the environment to try this out
 >  myself.
 >  
 >  Best regards,
 >  
 >  - H=E5vard
 >  
 >
 >   
 Yes I will,
 
 Due to the fact that getconf on solaris is totaly broken and the author
 does not want to fix the package to give the correct values one has only
 one option and that is to
 ignore the output from getconf all together...this removes the compiler
 warnings all together and makes shure perl5 gets build correctly on the
 solaris/opensolaris platform.
 Someone did a partial fix in the original  source code but forgot to
 finalize the last 3 entries in the script who  get  used  by  solaris 
 10  & opensolaris...so I fixed those becuase
 the warning messages emitted on opensolaris turn the whole build into a
 mess and sometimes cause the program not to build at all...Mostly a
 cosmetic fix but it also has implications
 in the build process becuase incorrect compiler directives are deduced
 witch is a bad thing ... it is not leathel in most cases that the bad
 values get used but in certain cases it makes the
 build process fail.
 
 Michael
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index