Re: pkg/42492: fonts/t1lib fails to build on NetBSD/i386 current

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/42492; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/42492: fonts/t1lib fails to build on NetBSD/i386 current
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:02:53 +0900 (JST)

 From: Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>
 Subject: Re: pkg/42492: fonts/t1lib fails to build on NetBSD/i386 current
 Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
 
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/42492; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>
 > To: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>
 > Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/42492: fonts/t1lib fails to build on NetBSD/i386 current
 > Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:57:03 +0100
 > 
 >  On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 06:47:35AM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
 >  > From: Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>
 >  > Subject: Re: pkg/42492: fonts/t1lib fails to build on NetBSD/i386 current
 >  > Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:45:02 +0000 (UTC)
 >  [..]
 >  
 >  > >  I think this all is related to the move from the xpm to libXpm in 
 > pkgsrc.
 >  > >  
 >  > >  x11-links has a lot of magic and I'm not sure if I understand the next 
 > part
 >  > >  correctly:
 >  > >  
 >  > >  If you look at pkgsrc/pkgtools/x11-links/xorg.mk you find that it 
 > tries to use something
 >  > >  from the buildlink3.mk files, the BUILDLINK_TREE entry.
 >  > >  Now x11/libXpm/buildlink3.mk has:
 >  > >         BUILDLINK_TREE+=        -libXpm
 >  > >  but there is no xfree.libXpm nor xorg.libXpm file in
 >  > >  pkgsrc/pkgtools/x11-links/files
 >  > >  only a xfree.xpm one.
 >  > >  
 >  > >  Would it help to copy the xfree.xpm to xorg.libXpm and delete the old 
 > entry?
 >  > >  
 >  > >  But that may only fix part of the missing libraries.
 >  > >  See 
 > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2009/12/24/msg011348.html for a 
 > full list
 >  > >  what is missing for the netbsd-5 branch.
 >  > >  
 >  > >  The following patch may solve parts of the problem, but I haven't 
 > tested it yet.
 >  > >  
 >  > >  The comment in files/xorg.pixman seems to be outdated since it has 
 > some duplicated
 >  > >  files and the .la file, which was mentioned shouldn't be there.
 >  > >  
 >  > >  Bernd
 >  > 
 >  > Hi,
 >  > 
 >  > Your patch solves this PR, pkg/42492 but the patch for files/xorg.pixman 
 > is broken
 >  > for my environment.
 >  
 >  What do you mean with broken?
 >
 >  It doesn't matter if there are extra entries in that file which does not 
 > exists on
 >  you filesystem, they are simply ignored while creating the symlinks.
 >  
 >  I have a /usr/X11R7/lib/libpixman-1.so.1.0 file, which you now removed from 
 > your
 >  version and you also keep the second copy of lib/pkgconfig/pixman-1.pc in 
 > that file.
 >  
 >  Ah, I see. -current has a libpixman-1.so.2.0
 
 For my environment, your patch for files/xorg.pixman is rejected.
 Then I patched by hand and have mistake (I removed libpixman-1.so.1.0).
 
 >  But that is not the only change which is needed for -current.
 >  
 >  I think it requires a lot more changes.
 >  
 >  > The following is my patch.
 >  > 
 >  > On CURRENT 5.99.22, at least libdrm.so.3 and libdrm.so.3.1 is lacks from 
 > files/xorg.libdrm,
 >  > but not fixed. Because I cannot understand the x11-links mechanism.
 >  
 >  I did that patch based on 5.0_STABLE so there are maybe some entries 
 > missing for -current.
 >  In your case the patch for xorg.libdrm would be:
 >  
 >  --- xorg.libdrm 5 Oct 2008 21:36:35 -0000       1.2
 >  +++ xorg.libdrm 24 Dec 2009 22:04:53 -0000
 >  @@ -6,4 +6,7 @@
 >   lib/libdrm.so
 >   lib/libdrm.so.2
 >   lib/libdrm.so.2.3
 >  +lib/libdrm.so.2.4
 >  +lib/libdrm.so.3
 >  +lib/libdrm.so.3.1
 >   lib/pkgconfig/libdrm.pc
 >  
 >  But as I said above it requires a lot more new entries.
 >  
 >  And there should be a xorg.MesaLib, but I have to leave that part to 
 > someone else.
 >  
 >  The new diff follows below, but I have not tested it.
 
 I have one question.
 In x11-links, should *all* libraries, header files, pkg-config files etc in 
native X.org
 or other vendor's X be listed and categorized in files in files/ directory?
 
 I cannot find any documentation about this.
 
 Now I am looking at my /usr/X11R7 directories.
 
 >  Bernd
 
 --
 Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
 PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3