Re: pkg/43311: update emulators/qemu 0.12.4 and fix for NetBSD'swm(4)

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/43311; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Cc: NetBSD bugtracking <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/43311: update emulators/qemu 0.12.4 and fix for
 NetBSD'swm(4)
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 16:29:37 +0200

 On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0000, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/43311; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: pkg-manager%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
 > tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/43311: update emulators/qemu 0.12.4 and fix for 
 > NetBSD'swm(4)
 > Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 22:53:05 +0900
 > 
 >  >  Looks good, please commit.
 >  
 >  One concern is a patch name.
 >  Is "patch-ee" okay for a new patch? Or patch-ab?
 >  I wonder why the latest one is patch-ed.
 
 Patch names are not really relevant. Add a comment to the patch (and
 send it upstream), please, and it doesn't matter what name the file
 has.
 
 Previously we sometimes used cvs history log to find out what a patch
 was used for, but with comments in the patches, I don't see any reason
 to only use patch file names once.
 
 Thanks,
  Thomas