Re: pkg/43774: update patchfile for openssl to support amd64 on Dragonfly BSD

[Damian Lubosch <dl%xiqit.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/43774; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Damian Lubosch <dl%xiqit.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/43774: update patchfile for openssl to support amd64 on 
Dragonfly BSD
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:13:37 +0200

 Am 18.08.2010 um 01:55 schrieb Thomas Klausner:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/43774; it has been noted by =
 GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 > To: dl%xiqit.de@localhost
 > Cc: NetBSD bugtracking <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 > Subject: Re: pkg/43774: update patchfile for openssl to support amd64 =
 on
 > Dragonfly BSD
 > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:52:42 +0200
 >=20
 > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:45:00PM +0000, dl%xiqit.de@localhost wrote:
 >> The problem is easily fixed by changing line 56 of =
 /usr/pkgsrc/security/openssl/patches/patch-aa
 >>=20
 >> from=20
 >> amd64-*-*bsd*)       OUT=3D"BSD-x86_64" ;;
 >>=20
 >> to
 >> amd64-*-*bsd*|*-dragonfly*)  OUT=3D"BSD-x86_64" ;;
 >>=20
 >> after that the compile flags are set correctly for 64 bit.
 >=20
 > Won't this also change the compilation flags for 32 bit DragonFly to
 > 64 bit and thus break 32 bit DragonFly systems?
 >  Thomas
 >=20
 
 Oh, you are right, it would. But when we change it to=20
 
 amd64-*-*bsd*|x86_64-*-dragonfly*)  OUT=3D"BSD-x86_64" ;;
 
 it should be ok then. I just tested it on i386 and x86_64.
 
 The relevant output of configure is here:
 
 Operating system: x86_64-whatever-dragonfly
 Configuring for BSD-x86_64
 Configuring for BSD-x86_64
 
 
 Operating system: i386-whatever-dragonfly
 Configuring for BSD-x86-elf
 Configuring for BSD-x86-elf
 
 
 Damian