pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/45433 (security/cyrus-sasl does not compile on Solaris with lang/gcc34)
The following reply was made to PR pkg/45433; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Clausen?= <joern.clausen%uni-bielefeld.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: Tim Zingelman <zingelman%gmail.com@localhost>,
solaris-pkg-people%NetBSD.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/45433 (security/cyrus-sasl does not compile on Solaris with
lang/gcc34)
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:25:41 +0200
> It does not appear that the package has been changed since 2 weeks
> ago... my first attempt to reproduce this failed... but I have gcc
> 4.4.5 on
> Oracle Solaris 10 9/10 s10x_u9wos_14a X86 (You don't mention your os
> version) I don't think the compiler difference would matter in this
> case.
i86: 5.10 Generic_142901-03
sparc: 5.10 Generic_142900-03
I'm pretty sure it's the compiler/linker combination, because of "text
relocation" problems.
> (I also did not start with a clean bootstrap, did you?) any other config
> steps?
> Any idea what else than pkgsrc might have changed? if it is only
> pkgsrc can you pinpoint more closely the time when it last worked and
> first failed?
The last working version was installed 2011-09-08, the pkgsrc tree was
synced around that time as well.
BTW: Even with "bmake SASL_DBTYPE=berkeley", I can't build the package
on sparc. The command lines libtool generates for building
libsasldb.so.2.0.25 are identical on both architectures, but on i86 the
build succeeds, on sparc it fails. I don't see any differences in the
generated config.log files. I suspect a regression in libtool.
--
Jörn Clausen
joern.clausen%uni-bielefeld.de@localhost
Hochschulrechenzentrum http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/hrz/
Universität Bielefeld
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index