Re: pkg/35211 (loop in pkgsrc build on Solaris 10)

[Wolfgang Stukenbrock <wolfgang.stukenbrock%nagler-company.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/35211; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Stukenbrock <wolfgang.stukenbrock%nagler-company.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost, solaris-pkg-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
pkgsrc-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
        gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/35211 (loop in pkgsrc build on Solaris 10)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:51:35 +0200

 Hi, I'm a little bit short in time.
 Does it realy make sence to post the information to one of theese 
 destinations again based on the "old" pkgsrc-version?
 Currently I've not the time to evaluate it again against the current 
 version, and I'm shure that this would be the first request to me it I 
 post it. (I would request this too, if I would be the maintainer for 
 something.)
 There are plenty of changes to pkgsrc affecting the Solaris build and it 
 is impossible to me to track them all.
 In most cases a broken gnu-configure setup or the use of libtool are the 
 source for the problems, but to verify this for a single package it will 
 take around on day of debugging and rebuilding of it.
 Both problem sources comes with the imported PD-software and are not 
 directly related to the pkgsrc-stuff itself.
 Currently (2011Q4) e.g. libcrypto will not build in 64-Bit without 
 setting some special options (-R and -L) for the linker in the 
 environment. There where no problems with this in 2010Q4 ...
 
 If I will upgrade to a recent version on Solaris, I will open a report 
 again if something still does not build correctly.
 
 Regards
 
 W. Stukenbrock
 
 
 
 dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: loop in pkgsrc build on Solaris 10
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
 > State-Changed-By: dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > State-Changed-When: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 06:16:13 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > Fixed.
 > 
 > (Can you repost the additional material to tech-pkg, or open a new PR with
 > it?)
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >