Re: pkg/47233 (xulrunner DragonFly x86_64 call of overloaded 'FromTicks(long long int)' is ambiguous)

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/47233; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, davshao%gmail.com@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/47233 (xulrunner DragonFly x86_64 call of overloaded
 'FromTicks(long long int)' is ambiguous)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:30:33 +0900 (JST)

 Hi,
 
 From: David Shao <davshao%gmail.com@localhost>, Date: Wed,  5 Dec 2012 
05:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
 
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/47233; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: David Shao <davshao%gmail.com@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc: ryoon%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/47233 (xulrunner DragonFly x86_64 call of overloaded
 >  'FromTicks(long long int)' is ambiguous)
 > Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:37:03 -0800
 > 
 >  My understanding is that both fixes to DragonFly's header files were
 >  applied to the 3.2-RELEASE branch.
 >  
 >  http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/032174.html
 >  "DragonFly_RELEASE_3_2 <sys/errno.h>: Try to fix errno's declaration a
 >  bit better for C++."
 >  
 >  http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/032178.html
 >  "DragonFly_RELEASE_3_2 int64_t is long on x86_64, and not always
 >  equivalent to long long."
 
 Do DragonFly people really want to drop support for 3.2.1 release?
 If so, I will revert them.
 
 Thank you.
 
 --
 Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
 PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3