Re: pkg/36517 (builtin.mk fails to detect the Solaris built in OpenSSL)

[Jörn Clausen <joernc%googlemail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/36517; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Clausen?= <joernc%googlemail.com@localhost>
To: Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%pkgsrc.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, solaris-pkg-people%netbsd.org@localhost, 
        pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
Lloyd.Parkes%ird.govt.nz@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/36517 (builtin.mk fails to detect the Solaris built in OpenSSL)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:18:34 +0100

 I reran the speed test with
 
 OpenSSL 1.0.1d 5 Feb 2013
 built on: Mon Feb 11 17:41:53 CET 2013
 options:bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(ptr,char) des(idx,cisc,16,long)
 aes(partial) blowfish(ptr)
 compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT
 -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall
 -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W
 
 The results are practically the same as with OpenSSL 0.9.8x,
 especially SHA1 and RMD160 are still significantly slower than their
 counterparts from /usr/sfw/bin/openssl.
 
 On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%pkgsrc.org@localhost> 
wrote:
 > * On 2013-02-07 at 15:55 GMT, J=F6rn Clausen wrote:
 >
 >> Just for the record: On Sparc, the "native" version of OpenSSL
 >> (/usr/sfw/bin/openssl) is significantly faster than the one compiled
 >> from pkgsrc, at least with standard compiler options, and for most of
 >> the algorithms:
 >>
 >> versus a not-so-old version from pkgsrc:
 >>
 >> OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10 May 2012
 >
 > It would be interesting to re-run this with the 1.0.1d I just imported.
 >
 > --
 > Jonathan Perkin       www.perkin.org.uk
 > github.com/jperkin  twitter.com/jperkin
 
 
 
 --
 Joern Clausen
 http://thebloeg.blogspot.com/
 http://www.oe-files.de/photography/