Re: pkg/48830: libreoffice4-4.2.2.1 build screwed by ruby211-2.1.1's tcl-8.5.15nb1 build

["OBATA Akio" <obata%lins.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/48830; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "OBATA Akio" <obata%lins.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/48830: libreoffice4-4.2.2.1 build screwed by ruby211-2.1.1's
 tcl-8.5.15nb1 build
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:56:37 +0900

 On Fri, 23 May 2014 01:15:00 +0900, M L Riechers <mlr%rse.com@localhost> wrote:
 
 >  Sorry if I seem a bit strident, but I'm rather lost and confused.
 > I have no idea.  We have a few ruby programs around, and I don't know
 >  if they require this.
 
 If you wrote those programs, you know what ruby modules are required.
 You must install such ruby-* package by yourself.
 If those programs are installed from pkgsrc, required ruby modules
 already should be installed automatically.
 
 >  I just cd /usr/pkgsrc/lang/ruby21 and Make.  I've assumed that that's
 >  the thing to do, because I've got no better information -- I'm rather
 >  shooting in the dark.
 
 Please see also DESCR, in addition to just a package name.
 lang/ruby21 is Ruby 2.1.1 release meta package, contains full upstream 
distribution.
 lang/ruby21-base is Ruby 2.1.1 release minimum base package
 
 >  If installing lang/ruby21-base will turn the trick, I've no problems
 >  with that.
 
 It you want to use Ruby language, it is sufficient.
 
 >  But, I wonder, is the impass going to be resolved, and are you
 >  suggesting building lang/ruby21-base as a temporary work-around?  If
 >  so, I can live with that.
 
 ruby21-base is already installed if you have ruby21 package.
 
 >  Now, do I compile the "(and other required ruby-* packages)"
 >  separately, by hand?
 
 As already described first.
 
 >  And, can I just (force?) delete the ruby-produced tcl, and go from
 >  there?
 
 Just remove ruby21 and ruby21-tk packages, no need to force.
 
 -- 
 OBATA Akio / obata%lins.jp@localhost