pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/51198: lang/g95 fails to build on Linux
The following reply was made to PR pkg/51198; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/51198: lang/g95 fails to build on Linux
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:43:17 +0200
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:15:01PM +0000, Benny Siegert wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/51198; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost,
> gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
> pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
> bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: pkg/51198: lang/g95 fails to build on Linux
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:14:39 +0200
>
> > You can decide the Fortran implementation to use. The point of g95 as
> > default was and still is that it is lighter than a full gcc49 or
> > whatever build.
>
> Given that g95 does not build on modern Linux systems: can we flip the =
> default *for Linux* to gfortran?=
Well, you can just as well install the Fortran frontend of your
distribution, right?
Joerg
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index