pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/49854 (libnbcompat: strtoll(3) mentioned twice for AC_REPLACE_FUNCS())
The following reply was made to PR pkg/49854; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>, gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: joerg%NetBSD.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
kamil%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/49854 (libnbcompat: strtoll(3) mentioned twice for
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS())
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:58:00 +0100
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--6rIhlGsns96dRVIMwxCn7OUJFohxs7L4R
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="GxRIE9QUowdNkkJAfgJTEmxrCNGDHXe36"
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>, gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: joerg%NetBSD.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
kamil%NetBSD.org@localhost
Message-ID: <83ba8a8d-667d-4edc-ae6e-3df54d983664%gmx.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/49854 (libnbcompat: strtoll(3) mentioned twice for
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS())
References: <pr-pkg-49854%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
<20150425130906.1282BA6555%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
<20161031172754.C013C7A2C7%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
<20161031180853.GA9513%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20161031180853.GA9513%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
--GxRIE9QUowdNkkJAfgJTEmxrCNGDHXe36
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 31.10.2016 19:08, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The duplicated check by itself is harmless. It isn't clear whether the
> long long non-support glue works properly or even where it is needed at=
> all. As such, it is unclear on whether the second instance is necessary=
> or not.
There was a discussion about "long long" in the ./build.sh tools (like a
year ago) and - if I remember correctly Minix people gave up on
supporting lack of longlong. Personally I don't see any reason to
support systems (compilers) without it in pkgsrc and C99 might be
official bare minimum. (I was told that lack of C99 in BSD/OS already
halts possibility to bootstrap there).
If there is an agreement on it, I will drop these harmless checks and so
make clean room for strtoi(3) addition in libnbcompat, based on
strtoll(3) with longlong support assumption (of course via intmax_t etc).=
--GxRIE9QUowdNkkJAfgJTEmxrCNGDHXe36--
--6rIhlGsns96dRVIMwxCn7OUJFohxs7L4R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=fBSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6rIhlGsns96dRVIMwxCn7OUJFohxs7L4R--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index