pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/51972: pyexpat.so is missing from python27 installation.
The following reply was made to PR pkg/51972; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/51972: pyexpat.so is missing from python27 installation.
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:10:08 +0100
Lars-Johan Liman writes:
> Hi Leonardo,
>
Hello Lars-Johan!
> <BLUSH!>
>
> Yes. After I had pressed the "send" button I continued my efforts and
> realized that it's now a separate package. The "DUUUUH!" could be heard
> all over the office ... :-( But the ticket had already gone in.
>
> Please accept my profuse apologies for wasting your time!
>
> (I'm still slightly puzzled why it was moved to a separate package,
> though, as it seems to be part of the main Python source tar-ball, but I
> may be wrong there ...)
>
> [...]
Do not worry! PRs are for that! :)
py-expat is not the only exception: py-curses, py-readline and
probably other modules that are parts of the "batteries included"
Python library are excluded in pkgsrc (I think grep-ping for
'lang/python/srcdist.mk' in the pkgsrc tree will reveal all of
them!).
Inside the pkgsrc ecosystem that's not a problem because packages
that needs them can just DEPENDS on them. However, it can be a
problem if a script (outside pkgsrc) expects that really all the
batteries are included! :)
Lars-Johan, ok to close the PR?
(otherwise, we can adjust lang/python*/DESCR or add a
lang/python*/MESSAGE with a list of "excluded" batteries or provide
a meta-pkgs with all the batteries included, but at least for the
latter I'm not sure if it's worth or not)
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index