|
Is it possible to build VLC 3.xx from 2018Q1 ?? Le 23/05/2018 à 08:05, Kamil Rytarowski
a écrit :
The following reply was made to PR pkg/53240; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost Cc: Subject: Re: pkg/53240: build vlc -2.2.6 from pkgsrc 2018Q1 fails Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 08:03:00 +0200 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --zzYpHE2ZDLy8zliaNAscLBGFVuVzUlZ9M Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Lkx7eBLwEqiZSryhBIgbOWRz9rhPl3wts"; protected-headers="v1" From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost Message-ID: <777622d4-ecc7-21ae-cb0a-25fe5da48ac4%gmx.com@localhost> Subject: Re: pkg/53240: build vlc -2.2.6 from pkgsrc 2018Q1 fails References: <20180522234116.GA21971%nyx.net@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20180522234116.GA21971%nyx.net@localhost> --Lkx7eBLwEqiZSryhBIgbOWRz9rhPl3wts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23.05.2018 01:41, Roy Bixler wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018 14:02:54 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> The patch is just wrong. >=20 > That's unfortunate, but I'm not surprised. After all, I don't know > how to test whether it works and I had no prior confirmation that it > was supposed to work. It did make vlc buildable for me. I also > mentioned another possible patch from >=20 > https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2018/04/07/msg026466.html >=20 > I'll repeat it here: >=20 > --- modules/codec/x264.c.orig 2015-04-13 19:54:35.000000000 +0000 > +++ modules/codec/x264.c > @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static int Open ( vlc_object_t *p_this=20 > fullrange =3D var_GetBool( p_enc, SOUT_CFG_PREFIX "fullrange" ); > p_enc->fmt_in.i_codec =3D fullrange ? VLC_CODEC_J420 : VLC_CODEC_I= 420; > p_sys->i_colorspace =3D X264_CSP_I420; > -#if X264_BUILD >=3D 118 > +#if X264_BUILD >=3D 118 && X264_BUILD < 155 > char *psz_profile =3D var_GetString( p_enc, SOUT_CFG_PREFIX "profi= le" ); > if( psz_profile ) > { >=20 > This is much simpler. Is it also wrong? If so, do you have an > alternative? >=20 This approach was rejected upstream so it's presumably wrong. Can you use VLC 3.x? It's in pkgsrc/wip/vlc. It crashes for me due to X issues, but it might works for you. --Lkx7eBLwEqiZSryhBIgbOWRz9rhPl3wts-- --zzYpHE2ZDLy8zliaNAscLBGFVuVzUlZ9M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJABAEBCAAqFiEELaxVpweEzw+lMDwuS7MI6bAudmwFAlsFBBQMHG41NEBnbXgu Y29tAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZsPpEP/RoH3vo7EYNj8x0lzAbSrxGO0nFfy41nb8PdmEAb J1vm2wgSJMGSB8gEsIdTgkUPUsmGO4vXbdgztmLFGbzc5VmtxtvsXa0cx1OPwfjA 5Rrhk6Mti461AokqbbWvKCxuNfkVb5L83JL61Vd0aR0KcEHibFT7wsWcYZZksCmi sXqcdKiodvn5ctujNpisDbqStJC1IsPFwtN3A6FLYZhfvdWgD6IBCDuypCjC7YHs 7PJSkGWabDoPydajUBMMQDYBM6WXW0eOn+K2XXj8q5Dt5UG5PN78x51ln+z/LQQb ke42Zaubat19dGL4JZUfD2Qoqb9FI4kAtKcQMtXK5KXfCapsgHCcarsZG8vf7LgG Vc+ukU8EAUk3K0kc0bBWlkoi0vuviJQuEXNScVd6M2L6yLjoga5Kh1oK6vzUAqlI MGDf11U/Cq8POAeu+TmaeLURWvdbhxJMbgYv1K0r2GGKkaLrcsJYqsGxhVtC/Xr5 LWwBhhppMdb0GDsgTaWAewnGdNq+n9X/okqJAjmJfBL1S4ZmNoj4S8XRSqI9RZGM W82F/ps0z2YjN2kxgTqlxXLFDro6YNVLsvFr4vycF5ZS+ZJCiOdVcLoN6CkFLg6f +Ta8PMbmKHMpQ4Zwt0lY7n83bEooWKBXIDVeT6IP+8wGzQcR1EJdbDhN/q8XJITR aDPT =wqDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zzYpHE2ZDLy8zliaNAscLBGFVuVzUlZ9M-- |