Re: pkg/58152: libarchive 3.7.3 fails to build on Solaris 10 SPARC

[Hiroshi Hakoyama <hiroshi-hakoyama%nagano.ac.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/58152; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Hiroshi Hakoyama <hiroshi-hakoyama%nagano.ac.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/58152: libarchive 3.7.3 fails to build on Solaris 10 SPARC
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:24:26 +0900

 Hi David,
 
 Thank you very much for the patch.
 I confirmed that the patch worked and fixed the problem.
 
 Hiroshi
 
 
 > 2024/04/15 12:06=E3=80=81David H. Gutteridge =
 <david%gutteridge.ca@localhost>=E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB:
 >=20
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/58152; it has been noted by =
 GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: "David H. Gutteridge" <david%gutteridge.ca@localhost>
 > To: Gnats Bugs <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > Cc:=20
 > Subject: Re: pkg/58152: libarchive 3.7.3 fails to build on Solaris 10 =
 SPARC
 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 23:00:48 -0400
 >=20
 > Simplest way to fix this is probably this patch.
 >=20
 > Index: archive_pack_dev.c
 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
 > RCS file:=20
 > =
 /cvsroot/pkgsrc/archivers/libarchive/files/libarchive/archive_pack_dev.c,v=
 
 > retrieving revision 1.9
 > diff -u -r1.9 archive_pack_dev.c
 > --- archive_pack_dev.c 18 Jan 2024 18:00:17 -0000 1.9
 > +++ archive_pack_dev.c 15 Apr 2024 02:51:56 -0000
 > @@ -36,9 +36,6 @@
 >   #if HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H
 >   #include <sys/cdefs.h>
 >   #endif
 > -#if !defined(lint)
 > -__RCSID("$NetBSD: archive_pack_dev.c,v 1.9 2024/01/18 18:00:17 adam =
 Exp=20
 > $");
 > -#endif /* not lint */
 >=20
 >   #ifdef HAVE_LIMITS_H
 >   #include <limits.h>
 >=20
 >=20
 > (sys/cdefs.h might not be necessary if we're dropping __RCSID.)
 >=20
 > Something elsewhere in the 3.7.3 import has evidently changed things =
 so
 > this particular line (unchanged from the 3.7.2 import) has now become =
 a
 > problem. That would take a bit more looking (and repo conversions are
 > behind again, so my preferred means isn't available yet).
 >=20
 > Dave
 >=20