Re: pkgsrc NetBSD 2.0.2/i386 bulk build results 2005-09-21

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:56:51PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:19:51PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > > > comms/xtel                         bouyer%NetBSD.org@localhost
> > > 
> > >  *** The following files are in /usr/pkg but not in the PLIST:
> > >          /usr/pkg/lib/X11/fonts/xtel/fonts.scale
> > 
> > Hum, could this file be installed or not depending on the version of X ?
> > I'm almost sure the PLIST was correct when I created this package and
> > this file didn't exists.
> > If it's dependant on the X version, what would be the correct way to fix 
> > this ?
> 
> I think adding
> FONTS_X11_DIRS=         ${PREFIX}/lib/X11/fonts/xtel
> and
> .include "../../mk/fonts.mk"
> will probably fix this, but I haven't tried.
> Take a look at fonts/profont which installs fonts this way.

Well, it doens't work well. using fonts.mk cause fonts/xtel/fonts.scale
to be deleted, but /usr/pkg/lib/X11/fonts/xtel remains because fonts.scale
is removed after the PLIST is run.
Remplacing @dirrm with a @unexec rm -rf doens't work well either,
at pkg_delete it complains:
rochebonne# pkg_delete xtel
Executing `/bin/rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/xtel'
===> Updating font databases
cd: can't cd to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/xtel

I think it's better to use fonts.mk because mkfontdir probably needs to be
run after the package is installed, but then I don't know how to cleanly
get rid of the stale directory at pkg_delete time ...
Any idea ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--