pkgsrc-Bulk archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkgsrc-current-destdir Linux 2.6.24-1-686-bigmem/i686 bulk build results 20080716.1221
>> > That section only shows that some people maintain more packages than
>> > others.
>>
>> No. This section counts a number of broken packages per maintainer.
> As others have said, "broken packages" may have a myriad of
> reasons, so this list becomes rather meaningless. As one
> example, if you don't set X11_TYPE=modular,
Yes, these counts are not ideal, and needs to be improved. If you know
when they "don't work", feel free to let me know.
I repeat again, the purpose of these counts were NOT to blame pkgsrc
developers. You may think about them as "further improvements are
needed". As I already said in pkgsrc-tech@ distbb is still in beta
stage. Any type of feedback is welcomed.
1) ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM / NOT_FOR_PLATFORM
2) ONLY_FOR_COMPILER / NOT_FOR_COMPILER
3) native X11 vs. modular xorg
4) ??? suggestions ???
> many, if not most of the modular x.org packages in pkgsrc will fail
> to build on any system.
First, I'll add an option to disable this section at all.
Second, I'm running distbb bulk builds under Linux always with
X11_TYPE=modular
> by the maintainer of the x.org packages, or shouldn't we instead
> thank him for doing it in the first place instead?
"Top maintainers"?
--
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index